Friday, 30 August 2019

Balter - NLC - Build notes

Some pics of a recent nonlinear circuit module build.
Its a delay -- for gates .. will help to loosen up my rigid drums.
The CV controlled delay  has a huge range..... from 7 milli-seconds to 1 minute.

You can get longer times by replacing the 1uF caps with larger values, say 10uF


This module is in Eurorack format.
gET  the SMD stuff on first.


RL = 10k

José Luis Torrente is a fictional character created by Spanish actor and director Santiago Segura and the main character in the Torrente scatological and dark comedy-action film series.






Links:
+ Wiki NLC
+ NLC Build Guide & BOM











Links:
wiki

BOM




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Click here to return to the NLC Build Index: 
 http://djjondent.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/non-linear-circuits-ncl-index.html 

Roland SP 808 Groove sampler

The 808 groove sampler came out in 1998 ... it's 21 years old.
There is a whopping 100MB of memory on a zip drive.
 {;-)

The SP 808 shares the same digits are its illustrious  brother the famous TR 808 drum.
This however was marketed as a workstation
You can still pick these up on Ebay quite cheaply.. if you are into vintage gear, this is still a good buy.


I think the machine is very underrated and I really like how it sounds.

It's a phrase sampler, sequencer, synthesizer, hard disk multitrack recorder with lots of studio quality effects. I think the market were DJ remixers ... musicians who wanted to sample.
In 1988, computers were basic and computer based sampling really difficult and expensive.
Plus, there is nothing like a real hardware machine that hardly ever crashes.
Daft Punk and The Prodigy used this on stage back in the 1990s

 The 16 pads reminded everyone of the AKAI MPC
The Sampler is 44.1kHz and 32kHz. It can  hold up to 1,024 samples. 
This is spread over16 pads x 64 banks.
Max sampling time is 25mins (stereo) at 44.1.
32 mins at 32khz

Roland used zip disks to store the samples. ... this is one of its weaknesses .......the zip can break down and be hard to repair. sadly WAV and AIFF formats aren't supported.


 The D-beam controller -- ITS A BIT LIKE A tHERMIN,
Just wave your hands above it.
You can  tweak effects,  pitch and volume


tHIS is the zip drive
Back in the 1990s, 100MB was a big deal.
Only SCSI drives could compete with this.

 The drive is both a blessing and a curse.
Over time , these break down, Its the Achillies heel.


mIDI  IN /OUT / THRU

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more info on the history of Roland Drum Machines click here

Thursday, 29 August 2019

Top 30 Automatic Watch movements of all time

 This is a controversal topic and very individual

I've tried to rank them on historical importance, engineering quality, accuracy potential, reliability, serviceability, innovation and influence—not simply price or prestige.

One caveat: this is a ranking of movement families/calibres, so closely related generations are sometimes grouped.

Let me know if you disagree ?

............................
RankMovementEraWhy it makes the listMy rating
1Rolex 31351988–2020sPerhaps the definitive modern automatic: incredibly robust, accurate, proven⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2Zenith El Primero 4001969–presentRevolutionary 5-Hz automatic chronograph; superb architecture⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
3Omega 8500/8900 Co-Axial2007–presentMajor advance in escapement, anti-magnetism and modern engineering⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
4Rolex 32352015–presentModern Rolex architecture with excellent efficiency and accuracy⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
5ETA 2824-21970s–presentPossibly the most influential Swiss workhorse ever⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
6Seiko 61391969–One of the first automatic chronographs; hugely important historically⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
7Omega 11201990s–2000sExtremely refined, reliable evolution of the ETA 2892⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
8ETA 2892-A21980s–presentThin, elegant, extremely versatile high-quality Swiss architecture⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
9Patek Philippe 2401977–presentLandmark ultra-thin micro-rotor movement⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
10Seiko 7S261990s–presentExtraordinary mass-market durability and influence⭐⭐⭐⭐½
11Rolex 15701960s–1980sLegendary robustness and chronometric performance⭐⭐⭐⭐½
12Grand Seiko 9S1990s–presentExceptional Japanese mechanical engineering and regulation⭐⭐⭐⭐½
13Miyota 90152010–presentExcellent thin, inexpensive alternative to ETA/Sellita⭐⭐⭐⭐½
14Sellita SW200-12000s–presentModern successor/alternative to ETA 2824⭐⭐⭐⭐½
15Rolex 31302000s–2020sSuperb simple automatic; arguably one of Rolex's best⭐⭐⭐⭐½
16Breguet 3130/1315 familyModernExcellent high-end architecture and finishing⭐⭐⭐⭐½
17IWC 85411950s–1970sPellaton winding system; exceptionally clever and durable⭐⭐⭐⭐½
18Jaeger-LeCoultre 8891980s–2000sThin, sophisticated luxury automatic used widely across Richemont⭐⭐⭐⭐½
19Universal Genève 2151960s–70sBrilliant micro-rotor architecture⭐⭐⭐⭐½
20Seiko 6R352019–presentExcellent long-reserve Japanese workhorse⭐⭐⭐⭐
21ETA 7750 Valjoux1973–presentThe automatic chronograph workhorse⭐⭐⭐⭐
22Omega 861/18611968–2020sNot automatic itself, but historically important—excluded from strict automatic ranking⭐⭐⭐⭐
23Tudor MT56xx2015–presentExcellent modern industrial movement, METAS-certified variants⭐⭐⭐⭐½
24Vacheron Constantin 11201960s–presentOne of the great ultra-thin Swiss automatics⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
25Piaget 12P1960sLandmark ultra-thin micro-rotor automatic⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
26Chopard 96.01-L1990s–presentElegant integrated micro-rotor architecture⭐⭐⭐⭐½
27Audemars Piguet 21211960s–2020sOne of the finest ultra-thin luxury automatics ever made⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
28Seiko Magic Lever family1959–presentBrilliantly simple and efficient automatic winding system⭐⭐⭐⭐½
29Omega 30T2/bumper family1940s–50sImportant bridge between early automatics and modern Omega⭐⭐⭐⭐
30Harwood automatic1920sOne of the first commercially successful automatic wristwatch systems⭐⭐⭐⭐
......................................

A correction to my table

I included the Omega 861/1861 at #22 even though it is manual-wind, so strictly speaking it shouldn't be in an automatic top 30. I'd replace it with:

#22 — Seiko 4R36

That gives you a genuine automatic movement.

................

The five I'd consider the "greatest"

If I had to reduce the entire history to five, I'd choose:

🥇 Rolex 3135 — greatest all-rounder

This is probably my #1.

Introduced in 1988, it became the benchmark for a robust, accurate, relatively simple luxury automatic.

It has:

  • 31 jewels
  • 28,800 vph
  • free-sprung balance
  • full balance bridge
  • excellent shock resistance
  • highly effective automatic winding
  • enormous service history

Its greatest achievement isn't that it is spectacular.

It's that it is spectacularly dependable.


🥈 Zenith El Primero — greatest chronograph

The El Primero is historically extraordinary.

Introduced in 1969, it ran at 36,000 vph / 5 Hz and was one of the first successful automatic chronographs.

It remains one of the most important mechanical chronograph movements ever produced.


🥉 Omega 8500/8900 — greatest modern engineering

This is where I think Omega deserves enormous credit.

The combination of:

Co-Axial escapement + silicon components + anti-magnetic construction + METAS certification

makes the modern Omega movement a technological powerhouse.

It's arguably more technically advanced than the Rolex 3135.


#4 ETA 2824-2 — greatest workhorse

This might actually be the most important movement commercially.

Think of it as the mechanical equivalent of a Toyota engine.

It is:

  • cheap
  • reliable
  • easy to service
  • widely available
  • accurate when regulated properly
  • supported by decades of parts and knowledge

Thousands of watches have used it.


#5 Patek 240 / AP 2121 / VC 1120 — greatest ultra-thin class

Here I'd almost call it a three-way tie.

These movements demonstrate a completely different philosophy.

The objective isn't maximum robustness.

It's:

How much mechanical sophistication can we fit into an extremely thin movement?

That's one of the hardest problems in mechanical watchmaking.


My rankings by category

This is actually more useful than a single overall ranking.

🏆 Best engineering

  1. Omega 8900
  2. Rolex 3235
  3. Rolex 3135
  4. Zenith El Primero
  5. Grand Seiko 9S

🛠️ Best reliability

  1. Rolex 3135
  2. ETA 2824
  3. Seiko 7S26
  4. Rolex 1570
  5. Tudor MT56xx

💰 Best value

  1. Seiko 4R/6R
  2. Miyota 9015
  3. Sellita SW200
  4. ETA 2824
  5. Seiko 7S26

🎨 Best finishing

  1. Patek 240
  2. AP 2121
  3. VC 1120
  4. Lange automatic calibres
  5. Chopard micro-rotor

🧠 Most innovative

  1. Zenith El Primero
  2. Omega Co-Axial
  3. Rolex Perpetual
  4. IWC Pellaton
  5. Seiko Magic Lever

📜 Greatest historical importance

  1. Rolex Perpetual
  2. Harwood automatic
  3. Zenith El Primero
  4. Seiko 6139
  5. ETA 2824
..................

But there's a fascinating distinction

If you're thinking about buying an automatic watch, I wouldn't necessarily buy the #1 movement.

For example:

ETA 2824

can be a better ownership proposition than an extremely complicated haute-horlogerie movement.

Why?

Because after 20–30 years you want:

Parts + watchmaker expertise + reliability + reasonable servicing cost

rather than simply the most beautiful movement.

That's why the humble ETA 2824, Sellita SW200, Miyota 9015 and Seiko 4R/6R families are so important.


.................

Jaipur - Hawa Mahal - The Palace of the Winds.

Jaipur.
It's a beautiful city with wide boulevards. It's the capital of the state of Rajasthan.
Founded in 1727 by Jai Singh II., it was designed during the British Colonial Period.
It's also one of UNESCO's world heritage sites.

It's often know as the Pink City because it was pained that colour to welcome Albert, Prince of Wales in 1876. Albert, later was crowned King Edward VII. One of his many titles was Emperor Of India.

There are lots of attractions to see when visiting Jaipur.
It's also a good base to visit other parts of Rajasthan such as Jodhpur (348 km), Jaisalmer (571 km), Udaipur (421 km)

A must see when visiting is the Hawa Mahal


This is the front. It's constructed of red and pink sandstone.
There are 5 stories. to this pyramid structure.
Built in 1799 by Maharaja Sawai Pratap Singh, the grandson of Maharaja Sawai Jai Singh, who was the founder of Jaipur

Its been described as a behive. There are 953 windows (Jharokhas). Notice the fine latticework..
Royal ladies were not allowed to be seen by the public without face coverings. This latticework allowed them to view the street, and not be seen.

These pics are the inside
Hans A. Rosbach (Attribution ShareAlike 3.0)
 
Sameer Goya


Ziaur Rahman 

Midi triggering the 1010 bitbox


I'm loving the bitbox.


It's a great sampler ... reminds me of the Roland SP 404 or a AKAI MPC
I've been searching for the best midi sequencer to pair with this module.
I've had success with the Arturia Beatstep Pro (the drum sequencer section) and the Roland TR-8

Midi note numbers output from the tr 8.
The Roland TR-8  outputs midi from channel 10. The midi note numbers are as follows:
Bass Drum - 36
Snare Drum - 38
Low Tom - 43
Mid Tom - 47
High Tom - 50
Rim Shot - 37
Hand Clap - 39
Closed HiHat - 42
Open HiHat - 46
Crash Cymbal - 49
Ride Cymbal - 51

Luckily, the bitbox also responds to midi on channel 10.
Midi input can also be used to modulate some parameters in the bitbox.

Ive seen the cirklon sequencer also used very effectively on the 1010.

Let me know if you of any other sequencers that pair well with the bitbox

 

note
TRS MIDI B
Arturia (e.g. Beatstep Pro and Keystep) and Novation (e.g. Circuit and Launchpad Pro) , Music1010 (MX4, blackbox, bitbox, synthbox) use ‘TRS MIDI B 

 

Synthesizer Power Supples ----- Linear Vs Switching

When building a synthesizer power supply, there are two choices:

1. Regulated Linear Power supply
2. Switch Mode Power Supply (SMPS)

----------------------

1. Regulated Linear Power supply.

These are quite simple in design.
Low noise ... most supply types produce no high-frequency interference.
But they are inefficient when compared to a SMPS . Output voltage is regulated by dissipating excess power as heat resulting in a typical efficiency of 30–40%.
Often uses heavy line-frequency transformers

It's hard to find AC Linear Wall Warts larger than 2A. This is a problem if you are building a large modular.
 This is a NLC linear power supply. It's very easy to build.

 aND ANOTHER example of a DIY linear PSU. One advantage is their ease to build. The components are cheap.

I use a 2A  AC brick with both of these.
Something like this:
I find that powering 3U to 6U (max) of Eurorack is OK with these ... check your modules power requirements of course.

You could of course use something like this if you needed more juice:
 This is a power one HCC 15-3A
This transformer based design has a center tap to give the centre ground. Both voltage outs are rectified and regulated to create dual voltage rails

Its very very heavy and would be hard to fit into a eurorack case. I used this in a Serge case.


Above is a doepfer A-100PSU2
Its a Linear PSU with ring core transformer
Output voltages/currents: +12V DC/1200mA, -12V DC/1200mA
Input voltage: 230V AC or 115V AC

Below is the L1 linear PSU
 It's a great kit.  1.5A per rail. 5V regulator on busboards.



2. Switch Mode Power Supply (SMPS) 

These first came out in the 1970s They are very efficient and their performance is much higher than linear regulators. SMPSs use PWM (pulse with modulation) to regulate the output voltage.
Their efficiency is very high, but the process is extremely complicated & creates high frequency noise.
They use diodes & capacitors to produce high voltage DC. This high DC voltage is then decreased and converted into a steady DC output using a system of transistors, capacitors, diodes, inductors & ferrite transformers.

The power bricks (wall warts) are a modern example of SMPSs. You will find them powering computer laptops and mobile phones.

This is a ATX SMPS from a desktop computer.


The advantages of this type of regulated PSU are that its smaller. There is very little heat generated.
Noisier due to the switching frequency of the SMPS. An unfiltered output may cause glitches in digital circuits or noise in audio circuits.
Above is the Doepfer A-100SSB. Its a small switcher PSU, suitable for up to 8 modules. (380mA)

Below is the Doepfer A-100PSU3
It's a +/-15V switching supply (wide range input 100...240V for mains voltage) followed by a linear regulation circuit that generates +12V and -12V. The +5V is a pure switching supply without linear regulation.

Really interesting design as it combines both linear & switching supplies. The black boxes are
Meanwell switching supplies. They create +15v, -15v, and +5v. The +/-15V must be passed through linear regulators to get +/-12V. I can't see the regulators in the photo ...maybe they are under the heat sink fins ???

The transformer in a switching power supply is also smaller than a traditional line frequency (50Hz or 60Hz depending on region) transformer,

If you need a high current wall wart a SMPS PSU will be easier to find. I use a 10A brick to power one of my Buchla cases.(though the OEM brick is expensive).


------------------------------
Meanwell RT65B.
Mouser

A great switching PSU which seems ideal for a small eurorack case (around 200HP)

5 VDC(5A)
12 VDC (2.8A)
- 12 VDC  (0.5A)

You can use a Bus board with filtering  to remove the PSU ripple noise.
Use something like a LC filter.
This consists of an inductor ( represented by the letter L) connected in series with the power flow and a capacitor (represented by the letter C) from the filtered voltage to ground.


I guess before you do this you need to ask the questions;
  1. Are you better off filtering the noise, or preventing noise in the first place?
  2. Is there actually much noise ?
  3. Is the LC filter making more noise than it is removing?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below is another example of a switching PSU
Its a Meanwell PD2515
Mouser: 709-PD2515



 It supplies : 24W 15V/0.8A -15V/0.8A 
iTS ok FOR a small buchla system

-----------------------------
Finally, this is the PSU for my amalgamod Eurorack system:


Plenty of juice for  this:


Links
+ NLC Build notes - Linear PSU 

Wednesday, 28 August 2019

WAA

 WAA WAM active


..................

WAM Active Limited (ASX: WAA) operates as a Listed Investment Company (LIC), meaning its financial metrics look very different from a standard operating business. [1, 2]
Because it functions as an investment fund, its "profit" is entirely dependent on market cycles, and it traditionally carries 0% debt. [1, 2]
Over the last 10 years, WAA has maintained solid consistency, punctuated by an absolute record-breaking year in FY2026 driven by heavily concentrated bets in small-cap resources, critical minerals, and artificial intelligence
....................
📊 Financial Breakdown Over the Decades
1. Profit & Investment Income
  • The Trend: WAA’s net profit fluctuates significantly from year to year because it relies on the realized and unrealized gains of its stock portfolio. Historically, it captures modest single-digit millions in quieter market years (e.g., $5.8M in FY23, $7.4M in FY24). []
  • Recent Performance: The company recorded its strongest financial year since its 2008 inception in FY2026. Driven by an astronomical portfolio return of 75.5%, operating profit before tax surged 360% to $48.1M AUD, while operating profit after tax grew to $33.8M AUD. [1]
2. Debt Levels
  • The Trend: WAA has consistently maintained 0% debt/equity leverage.
  • Why it matters: As an LIC focused on an active trading style with small-cap equities, it manages liquidity entirely through cash reserves rather than debt. During volatile patches in 2026, its cash holdings peaked at 35.5% to mitigate risk and maintain buying power. [1, 2, 3]
3. Return on Equity (ROE) & Management Effectiveness
  • The Trend: ROE generally hovers between 9% to 13% during normal market conditions (e.g., 9.1% in FY23, 10.4% in FY25).
  • Recent Performance: Trailing Twelve Month (TTM) figures place its Return on Equity at 17.29%, driven by the aggressive tailwinds of its underlying portfolio allocations. [1, 3]
4. Dividends & Capital Management
  • The Trend: Providing a regular income stream via fully franked dividends is a core objective. WAA has a 10+ year track record of paying robust, fully franked dividends. [1]
  • Recent Performance: Capitalizing on the FY26 windfalls, the board distributed a total of 9.4 cents per share (6.4¢ full-year dividend + 3.0¢ in special dividends), offering a grossed-up dividend yield of roughly 12.7%. [1]

⚠️ The Catch: The Share Price vs. NTA Discount
When looking at WAA's 10-year trajectory, a crucial metric for investors is the relationship between its share price and its Net Tangible Assets (NTA). [1, 2]
Even though its underlying portfolio grew at an annualized rate of 13.3% since inception, the Total Shareholder Return (TSR) over the past 5 to 10 years has slightly lagged behind the actual portfolio performance. For instance, while its 5-year portfolio return to mid-2026 was a massive 20.6% p.a., the actual shareholder return was 9.6% p.a. [1, 2]
This lag is due to WAA shifting from trading at a 7.5% premium to NTA back in 2021 to trading at a persistent 9.5% discount to NTA. The stock market has historically undervalued its explosive asset gains, creating an environment where investors can currently buy the underlying assets at a discount
.................


The Net Tangible Assets (NTA) per share for WAM Active Limited (ASX: WAA) typically fluctuates around $0.90 to $1.15 before tax over a rolling 10-year period. [1, 2]
Because WAA operates as an active trading Listed Investment Company (LIC) that distributes a significant portion of its profits as regular fully franked dividends, its NTA does not show a linear capital growth curve. Instead, gains are continuously recycled and paid out to shareholders. [1]
📊 Long-Term NTA Trend Overview
While month-to-month figures move dynamically with market conditions, historical snapshots outline how the pre-tax NTA generally moves:
  • Recent NTA (Mid-2026): $0.96 (as of July 31, 2026), recovering strongly after an exceptional year where the investment portfolio grew by 75.5%.
  • Early 2026: $1.02 (February 2026).
  • Mid-2021: $1.00 to $1.03.
  • Historical Base (approx. 10 years ago): $1.01 (September 2015). [1, 2, 3, 4]

💡 Key Contextual Mechanics
When evaluating WAA's NTA history over a decade, it is crucial to account for two main wealth-degrading impacts on the asset value itself, which are instead passed to investors as total return:
  • Dividend Decretion: WAA has distributed over 108.9 cents per share in fully franked dividends since its inception. Because paying a dividend directly lowers the company's cash balance, each dividend payout permanently clips the NTA down by that exact cash amount. [1, 2, 3]
  • Performance Fees & Tax: In high-performance periods (such as FY2026), sizable corporate tax obligations and performance fees create a variance between gross investment portfolio returns and the ultimate net tangible assets reported to the market. For example, in FY2026, the portfolio returned 75.5%, but performance fees and tax narrowed the pre-tax NTA increase to 51.7%. [1]
For the exact monthly breakdown across the entire 10-year archive, you can view the official filings directly on the Wilson Asset Management WAA Product Page or pull the historical statutory monthly announcements from the ASX Company Profile for WAA.
............

......................