Monday, 28 July 2025

Behmor Roaster - general temps etc

Important nuance to note with your Behmor
The Behmor doesn’t directly display true bean temperature—it shows a chamber/wall temp. 
The actual bean temp isn't the sensor reading & the Behmor temps are nothing like what you'd expect from a standard drum roaster.

The Behmor uses an infrared quartz heating element that heats differently to a gas flame, hot plate, electric coil or air-convection. Quartz light provides near instant heat but unlike most heating elements it heats objects not the surrounding air. The infrared rays (similar to the sun) pass through the air and are absorbed by solid objects.

The Behmor roaster safety button requires users to press the START button  (or C button) within a 30-second window when the timer hits 75% completion (e.g., 2:30 remaining on a 10-minute roast), indicated by a flashing display. Failure to do so results in Error 7 (Err7) and an automatic, forced cooling cycle to prevent fire hazards.





🔥 Use Temp B (chamber) as your main reference
Why Temp B is better
+ It measures the air temperature in the roasting chamber
+ That’s closer to what the beans are actually experiencing
+ It responds more smoothly and predictably during the roast.
+ The B probe is attached below the drum chamber.
+ Most Behmor roasting guides and profiles are based on Temp B

🧱 Temp A is focused on measuring the exhaust temperature .
Exhaust temps are generally useful for measuring the momentum and total energy in a roaster, however Temp A doesn't seem to measure anything until latter in the roast cycle..
+ It is useful as a secondary safety indicator (e.g. overheating), but not for tracking roast stages.
+ The “A” temperature reading only becomes active midway through the roast when the fan kicks on. 

🎯 Practical takeaway
Track your roast stages (dry end, browning, first crack) using:
Temp B + time + sensory cues (smell, sound, colour)
Glance at Temp A only to make sure things aren’t running away too hot

🧠 Simple rule of thumb
Temp B = “what’s happening to the beans”
Temp A = “what the machine walls are doing”























🎯 Charging/Preheating

Charge temp
On a Behmor 1600 Plus Coffee Roaster, “charge temp” isn’t as tightly controlled as on a commercial drum roaster—but you can still think in terms of a preheat target (Temp B) before you drop the beans.

🔥 Good starting charge (preheat) temps:
The manual recommends:
 Press any weigh and then Start. Allow the system to run for up to 1:30 minutes. Press OFF,
insert roasting drum, tray and start your roast.

Use Temp B (chamber temp):
I pre heat to 104C-120C (220-250F).

+ Preheat with the chaff collector in (and if possible, the drum too).
+ Load beans quickly
+ Start on P1 or P2 (full or near-full power) in auto mode
    or P5 in manual mode.
Adjust based on goals:
+ Want more acidity / shorter roast → charge closer to 120C
+ Want more control / smoother profile → stay around 100°C

☕ What actually happens on Behmor
When you add beans, temp will drop hard (20–40°C)
Then it climbs back up as the roast progresses
So your “charge temp” is really about:
+ how much momentum you start with
+ how quickly you get through drying

⚠️ Behmor-specific quirks
Preheating too high (>150°C) can:
+ Trigger safety shutdown
+ Increase risk of scorching
As there is no direct bean temp probe → rely on:
+ time to dry end (~4–6 min)
+ time to first crack (~9–12 min)

🧠 Simple rule of thumb
Start around ~120°C Temp B, then adjust based on:
+ How fast you hit dry end
+ How soon first crack arrives

=================================================

🌡️ Dry End Temperature Range

~140°C to 160°C (302°F to 320°F bean temp equivalent)
Many Behmor users track dry end by time + visual cues:
Usually around 4–6 minutes into the roast (depending on batch size and profile)

===============================================
☕ Browning Phase (Maillard Reaction)

🌡️  temp (approx.).. B button
~140-150°C 

👀 What to look for
Beans shift yellow → light brown → cinnamon
Smell turns from hay → bread/toast → caramel
Surface becomes more matte and textured
===============================================
🔊 First Crack

🌡️  temp (approx.)
~141°C on the B probe.

👂 What to listen for
Distinct popping/cracking sounds (like popcorn, but sharper)
Beans visibly expand and shed chaff
Aroma becomes sweet, nutty, more “coffee-like”

==================
Afterburners.
Mid way through the roast there will be a temporary drop in the B temperature.
This is normal. The program is designed to have a fan come on to pull air/ smoke through the afterburners to burn off smoke and other impurities. 
When the afterburners come on, heat will be drawn over the beans and away from the sensor thus the reading on b drops.




===========================
Below are 2 examples of standard medium roast profiles.
They are useful guides as to what sort of temperatures the Behmor will read during a standard roast.

The first is a 200g roast. @ 200g setting.
I press the200g button, then P1 button + "start".
Then press P5  (to enter manual mode)
Note that in manual mode, P5 = 100% power.
(Temp: just using the B button - for chamber temp only)
Note that my max temp for this roast is 160C (The Behmor automatically shuts down at 170C)
so one of my goals is to keep the B temperature below this value.

Charge temp: 120C

Time    Temp B
00.00 : 120C (charge)
00.30 : 120C (press P5)
01.00 : 126C
01.30 : 132C
02.00 : 138C
02.30 : 145C
03.00 : 151C
03.30 : 157C (press P4)
04.00 : 162C (press P3)... I dropped temp to P3 to avoid the shutdown feature
04.30 : 163C
05.00 : 160C (@ 5mins the fan will start & the heat will start to drop, so I'll need to increase the power)
05.30 : 146C (press P5)
06.00 : 142C
06.30 : 146C = Dry End
07.00 : 148C (press P4) ... I'm gradually reducing the temp...you can also open the door to cool the roast
                                           Also use fast drum (this mimics air flow in a drum roaster)
07.30 : 148C (press p3)... I'm stretching out the browning phase by making sure the 
                                          temperatures aren't constantly increasing.
08.00 : 147C
08.30 : 142C (press P4)... increase the temp a bit.. stabilise the temp .. avoid crashes or peaks
09.00 : 141C
09.30 : 141C
10.00 : 141C
10.30 : 141C --- First Crack  
11.00 : 142C (you could press P3 or P2 to lower the temp if desired).
11.30 : 138C 
12.00 : 140C... exothermic reaction !
12.30 : 142C
13.00 : drop

------------------------------------------------------------

This is an example of one of my standard medium roast profiles.
This is a 100g roast. @ 200g setting.
I press the 200g button, then P1 button + "start".
Then press P5  (to enter manual mode)
Note that in manual mode, P5 = 100% power.
(Temp: just using the B button - for chamber temp only)
Note that my max temp for this roast is 160C (The Behmor automatically shuts down at 170C)
so one of my goals is to keep the B temperature below this value.
Another goal is to aim for a 50% drying ratio, 30% browning, 20% develop.
So accurately marking Dry End, FC, etc is impt.

Actual Charge Temp : 92C (B setting)
I preheated the drum & machine to 110C but lost some heat when I opened the door & dropped
the beans into the drum.

Time    Temp B
00.00 : 92C (charge)
00.30 : 93C (press P5)
01.00 : 100C
01.30 : 101C
02.00 : 102C
02.30 : 120C
03.00 : 137C
03.30 : 143C 
04.00 : 150C 
04.30 : 155C
05.00 : 157C  - fan kicked on. The A temp is available now.
05.30 : 162C    I pressed P4 to lower temp. 
06.00 : 158C = Dry End @ 5.40
06.30 : 157C 
07.00 : 156C .. I'm gradually reducing the temp...you can also open the door to cool the roast
                                           Also use fast drum (this mimics air flow in a drum roaster)
07.30 : 155C (I could press p3 but the temp seems pretty stable for now)... 
                      I'm stretching out the browning phase by making sure the temperatures aren't 
                      constantly increasing.
08.00 : 155C
08.30 : 142C (press P4)... increase the temp a bit.. stabilise the temp .. avoid crashes or peaks
09.00 : 144C
09.30 : 147C --- First Crack  ?
10.00 : 150C
10.30 : 152C Drop

If you intend to run the full cooling cycle  press "cool" on 1st crack since the roast will continue to develop while the hot chamber cools.

UNO Synth Pro

 A demo of the UNO Synth Pro.

...
Thanks for holding the meeting last Tuesday Ed.
We met Chris Steller, product specialist with Sound & Music. 
Chris has a wealth of industry experience as a presenter and trainer in hardware and software music technology.

Wednesday, 23 July 2025

Buchla 156

 The  Buchla 156 is a very early example of a CV processor .... possibly the earliest.


It was developed to enable more flexibility in the 
Buchla 100 system.

Most of the early 100 modules (such as the Buchla 158 VCO) didn't have a any way to attenuate /offset voltages entering their often single CV inputs. 
So the 156 was developed to do this.
In the later 200 series Buchla added CV processors into modules like the 258 VCO. (see pics below)

As Buchla evolved, new CV processor modules were invented such as the 256, 257 & the Verbos 254v but the 156 is the grand daddy of them all.

The module consists of two independent CV processors.... left (A) & right (B).

Left CV processor (A)
The left CV processor has two inputs. They feed into a mixer (bottom knob) .
The centre knob (offset) adds a + voltage
offset to the input (0V-15V range). 

If you are using this in a 200 system the voltages will probably be in the range of 0-10V.


The top knob mixes between the external signals and the internal voltage offset . 
The output is at the top 

Right CV processor (B)
The right processor is similar to the left one except it has one inverting input. 























Buchla 158 & 144 VCOs
 didn't have many CV inputs so the 156 was useful in manipulating CV voltages from keyboards and sequencers before they touched the VCO.

The 258 incorporated CV processing circuits into the module.


other Buchla CV processors:

Tuesday, 22 July 2025

GS - all about Saturated groups

 La Marzocco didn’t invent the saturated group concept, but they’re the company that perfected it and made it famous.
Early machines (mid-20th century) experimented with group heads mounted very close to or partially integrated with boilers.

This early La Pavoni is connected to the boiler by a pipe.
The boiler temp is very different to the group-head (GH) temp.
It takes skill to pull a good shot.

The goal back then was already clear: reduce temperature loss between boiler and coffee puck. This is the reason the GH is away from the boiler. The design is actually really good as you have in effect two temps at the same time with a single boiler ... A lower GH temp to brew the coffee, and the higher boiler temp
for steaming milk.
 
But these designs were often inconsistent, hard to control & not fully “saturated” in the modern sense.
The concept existed, but wasn’t refined.





In the 1970s, La Marzocco changed the game.
It introduced true saturated group heads (not just attached) but fully integrated.
When paired them with dual boiler systems (brew boiler + steam boiler) they
delivered unprecedented temperature stability

A key milestone was the La Marzocco GS1 (1970):

This was one of the first machines with saturated groups & dual boilers.
It set the blueprint for modern commercial espresso machines.
Today, many high-end machines (Synesso, Slayer, etc.) follow the same principle.






☕ Simple analogy
Others: “What if we attach the group to the boiler?”
La Marzocco: “What if the group is the boiler—and we control it precisely?”

In the early days stability was the goal.
It was important to “Keep temperature constant at all costs”
Now, Stability is assumed and the focus is on control, repeatability & customisation of extraction.


Comparisons to other espresso machines:

Rancilio Silva
The Rancilio Silvia’s boiler is not directly integrated with (or “saturated” into) the group head.
The boiler and group head are separate components.
The Silvia’s boiler is indirectly connected (via plumbing and pump), not structurally or thermally integrated with the group head.

Water is heated in the boiler, then pumped through a pathway to the group head when you brew.
It uses a simple commercial-style group (often called a “ring group”), not an E61 or saturated design.
That’s why Silvia users often deal with temperature surfing—the group head isn’t being actively stabilized by the boiler mass or circulating water.






This is a pic of the boiler from a silvia











E61 group
(thermosiphon group)
Stable once hot, but less precise (a few °C swing possible)
You “tune” temp with flushes rather than exact settings
Heavy brass group stabilises temperature across shots

It's often better than expected once fully warmed though this takes some time.
The separate heavy group uses passive hot water circulation
The big thermal mass keeps it stable once hot.











This method requires cooling flushes to hit correct temp
But once dialled in, it's very repeatable
The E-61 also has natural mechanical pre-infusion 
(gentle ramp-up)









Gaggia Classic
It’s a single-boiler machine with a separate group head
The group is  however bolted to the boiler, though not integrated into it
Water flows from the boiler → through the group → to the puck only during brewing.

Why it’s not “saturated” ??

A saturated group means:
The group head is literally part of the boiler & it’s surrounded by brew water at all times.
Temperature is extremely stable and directly controlled.

The Gaggia Classic is best described as:
A semi-integrated / bolt-on group with some passive heat transfer from the boiler



In practice this makes it more thermally stable than very cheap machines
But nowhere near an E61 thermosiphon system, or a true saturated group


Decent DE1
This is not a big classic boiler/group casting
It instead uses heaters + sensors + software
Thus it achieves saturated-level control without mass.
It has a faster heat-up time & extreme levels of control (pressure, flow, temp curves)
Less “metal mass,” more software-driven saturation

Saturday, 19 July 2025

The differences between the Linea Classic, PB, Mini, and Micra

Here’s a clear, side-by-side breakdown of the four Linea models—focusing on what actually matters: workflow, control, size, and use case. 
Note that the Linea family focuses on consistent 9-bar (flat pressure) extraction rather than pressure profiling, but they are not strictly limited in their pressure settings. 

Linea Classic (the original workhorse).
These were used in Starbucks  stores in the US in the 90's
Today a La Marzocco Linea Classic S  will set you back about $15,500.00 · 



+ It's a iconic commercial dual-boiler espresso machine built for reliability and high-volume cafés.

= Type: Commercial (1–4 group)
= Philosophy: Simplicity + durability
= Controls: Mostly manual or basic volumetric
= Why it exists: Bulletproof café machine

👉 Key idea: “Set-and-forget consistency with minimal electronics.”

Dual  horizontal boilers + saturated groups = very stable shots
Designed for high-volume cafés since the 90s

-----------------------------------------------

Linea PB (modernized Classic)

La Marzocco Linea PB Espresso Machine · $27,995.00
Digitally controlled commercial machine with programmable features and modern workflow upgrades.

+ Type: Commercial (successor to Classic)
+ Philosophy: Same machine, but smarter
+ Controls: Digital interface + programming

👉 Key idea: “Classic performance with modern control.”

+ Programmable brew volume, temps, auto backflush
+ Lower profile for better bar workflow
+ Dual  horizontal boilers + saturated groups = very stable shots
+ Optional built-in scales (ABR)

--------------------------------------------------------

Linea Mini (prosumer / home-commercial hybrid)
La Marzocco Linea Mini · $8,999.00 · 

Compact dual-boiler machine bringing commercial-level performance into the home.

+ Type: Home / prosumer
+ Great build quality
+ rotary pump.
+ has a extra solenoid valve so you can get soft saturation at the start and 
   pre-wet your puck.
+ 58 mm portafilter
+ Philosophy: Café performance at home
+ Controls: Simple + app-connected (newer versions)
+ you need the special La Marzocco Acacia scale = brew by weight.
+ 30Kg weight
+ 2.5L boiler
+ 3 L steam boiler
+ you can adjust the pump pressure (from the standard 9 bar) with a screw on the top.

👉 Key idea: “A shrunk-down café machine.”

+ It has the same dual boiler concept as commercial Lineas
   The dual-boiler system (horizontal) is not a traditional heat exchanger.
   To maintain temperature stability for high-volume home espresso there is a small 
   heat exchanger pipe which runs inside the 3-liter steam boiler to preheat 
   the brew water 
   before it enters the dedicated 0.17-liter brew boiler. 
   This ensures instant heat recovery and precise temperature control.
   The PID regulates the heating element in the 170ml (or 175ml depending on version) 
   coffee boiler, ensuring high temperature stability, with the probe
   located near the saturated group head.
   PID Adjustment: On the original Mini, this was adjusted via a wheel; 
   on the new Linea Mini R, it is adjusted via a Wi-Fi-connected app.
+ Can be plumbed but needs a filter. 
+ Doesn’t require plumbing however  (tank-based)
+ Manual paddle for shot control.
+ This machine is built to last (provided you don't use bad water)

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Linea Micra (ultra-compact enthusiast machine)
La Marzocco Linea Micra Coffee Machine · $5,999.00 · 

Ultra-compact dual-boiler espresso machine designed for serious home users with limited space.
+ Type: Home (smaller than Mini)
+ vertical boilers
+ 5 min heat up time.
+ rotary pump
+ 58 mm portafilter
+ 19Kg weight
+ 250ml front brew boiler.
+ Philosophy: Accessibility + compactness
+ Controls: App + simplified interface
   Through the app you can change the steam pressure, brew temp.
   The app also allows you to have pre-brew & pre-infusion (if it's plumbed in).
    Pre brew is just wetting the puck (no pressure)
    Pre infusion is only possible when you have line pressure applied to the puck.
+ Pairs with the normal Acaia Scale 

👉 Key idea: “Mini performance, smaller + easier.”

+ Same core performance but smaller footprint
+ App-based control + simplified workflow
+ Slightly less power and capacity than Mini

-------------------------------------------
FeatureLinea Classic SLinea PBLinea MiniLinea Micra
Use caseHigh-volume caféHigh-end caféHome / light commercialHome
SizeLarge (multi-group)Large (multi-group)CountertopSmall countertop
PlumbingYesYesTank (optional plumb-in)Tank only
Control styleManual / basic volumetricFully programmable digitalManual + appApp-focused + simple
Tech levelLow (intentionally)HighMediumMedium
ConsistencyExcellentExcellentExcellentExcellent
Workflow speedVery highVery highMediumLower
Steam powerVery strongVery strongStrongStrong
Target userBaristas / cafésAdvanced cafésEnthusiastsCasual enthusiasts

-------------------------------
🧠 The real differences (explained simply)
1. Classic vs PB (café machines)

Classic (on the left):
Mechanical, simple, easy to repair
Fewer things to break





PB:
Same core machine + digital control layer
Better for precision, consistency across staff

👉 Think:
Classic = Toyota Land Cruiser
PB = Land Cruiser with electronics + driver assists







------------------------------------

2. Mini vs Micra (home machines)
Mini:
Closer to café performance
More power, more manual feel
Micra:
Smaller, easier, more “plug-and-play”
Slight trade-off in steam power + workflow

👉 Think:

Mini = enthusiast tool
Micra = premium daily driver

--------------------------------
3. Commercial vs Home (the biggest divide)

This is the most important distinction:

Classic / PB
Built to run all day, nonstop
Multi-group (2–4 group heads)
Require plumbing + high power

Mini / Micra
Built for 1–2 users
Single group
Plug-and-play

👉 They’re not really competitors—they’re different categories.

-------------------------------

🧭 Which one should you care about?
Running a café?
= Go Classic (simplicity) or PB (control)
Serious home barista?
= Go Mini
Want great coffee with less fuss / space?
= Go Micra

---------------

🧾 Bottom line
+ Classic: timeless, rugged, minimal
+ PB: Classic + modern brain
+ Mini: café DNA at home
+ Micra: Mini, but smaller and friendlier


Thursday, 17 July 2025

Tuesday, 15 July 2025

ARP 2600 1st patches

Basic AR patch.
We will use the AR envelope generator button to trigger a sound.
This patch is useful for getting a basic sound out of your ARP 2600 if you don't have a keyboard.


Everything is zeroed.
OSC 1 is the only sound source

Open up the filter.
Res = 0

The AR envelope has a instant attack and quick decay.
Sound passes from VCO1 > filter > VCA

You can develop the sound by slowly adding VCOs to the filter input & tweaking 



gaggimate - initial wi-fi setup.

 I'm so happy I finally managed to connect the gaggimate to my wifi

I'm not a network engineer but maybe this will help someone (with plain language)
understand basic wi-fi networking.
I think this basic knowledge is necessary.

The gaggimate PCB uses  a ESP32-S3 N8R8 microcontroller and has connected to this 
a 2.1-inch display.

The ESP32-S3 N8R8 microcontroller.
The ESP32-S3-N8R8 has Wi-Fi connectivity. It is based on the ESP32-S3 chip, which includes integrated 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi (802.11 b/g/n) and Bluetooth 5 (LE). The N8R8 designation refers to the amount of Flash and PSRAM memory available on the module, specifically 8MB of Flash and 8MB of PSRAM
This PCB ESP32 handles sensors, relays, and control logic.


The 2.1 inch display
The 2.1" LilyGo screen.
The main control chip adopts the ESP32-S3R8 Tensilica Xtensa Dual-Core LX7 Microprocessor. This chip supports Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n and Bluetooth 5.

Programming Platform Arduino-ide, VS Code



The LilyGO ESP32 is often used mainly as the display/secondary interface.
Wi-Fi can be handled by either, depending on how the firmware was configured

Both the PCB board and the LilyGo screen have a ESP32-S3 microcontroller, 

Check the IP/device list in your router.
If you see one ESP32 device, that’s the one doing Wi-Fi.


Hottop custom profile 2 & 3

 The Hottop 2K+ behaves much closer to a small commercial drum than most home roasters, but with lower thermal mass and slower recovery, so the key is anticipation and smooth adjustments.

Important quirks:
Heat changes have a delay (~20–40 sec)
Too much fan early = heat loss + stalled roast
Easy to crash RoR after first crack if you overcorrect

🧠 Hottop-specific roasting mindset

This matters more than the numbers:

Think in momentum, not temperature
Make changes before you need them (due to lag)
Avoid big jumps in P or F
Aim for a smooth declining energy curve

-------------------

☕ Gesha Profile (Hottop 2K+)

(Dense, high-altitude, delicate)

🎯 Goal:
Longer roast, smooth declining heat, preserve florals
🔥 Step-by-step profile
Preheat Empty drum to ~165–170°C (IBTS or bean probe equivalent)

Charge (0:00)
Drop beans (~250g batch ideal)
Power: 100 / Fan: 0 / Drum: default

Drying phase (0:00–5:00)
Keep Power: 100
At ~3:30 → F: 1–2 (light airflow)
Target: Yellow at ~5:00

Maillard phase (5:00–8:30)
5:00 → P: 80 / F: 2
6:30 → P: 70 / F: 3
👉 You’re gradually reducing energy while increasing airflow

First crack (~8:30–9:30)
Just before FC (~8:00): P: 60 / F: 3–4
At first crack: P: 50 / F: 4–5

Development (post-FC)
60–90 sec development
Keep airflow higher to clear chaff/smoke

Drop:
~10:00–11:00
Light–medium (end temp ~202–205°C equivalent)

⚠️ Watch for:
RoR crash after FC → don’t drop power too fast
Too much fan early → stalls before yellow





















📊 Target RoR Landmarks

| Time | Stage         | Target RoR (°C/min) | What you're doing         |
| ---- | ------------- | ------------------- | ------------------------- |
| 1:30 | Turning point | 20–25               | Max power pushing heat in |
| 3:00 | Early drying  | 18–20               | Still strong momentum     |
| 5:00 | Yellow        | 14–16               | Start tapering heat       |
| 7:00 | Mid-Maillard  | 10–12               |  decline                  |
| 8:30 | First crack   | 7–9                 |  control                  |
| Drop | ~10:30        | 4–6                 | Gentle finish             |

🎮 How this maps to Hottop controls
0:00–3:00 (P100, F0)
→ Build that high initial RoR (~20+)
3:30–6:00 (step P down gradually)
→ Prevent RoR from staying too high
Before first crack
→ You must already be declining to ~8–10 RoR
(If not → you’ll get a spike/flick)
Post first crack
→ Small power reductions only
→ Use fan to control, not kill heat

==================================

☕ Robusta Profile (Hottop 2K+)

(Lower density, harsher compounds)

🎯 Goal:
More development, smoother body, reduce harshness

🔥 Step-by-step profile

Preheat:

Slightly lower: ~160–165°C
Charge (0:00)
P: 90 / F: 0

👉 Less aggressive than Gesha

Drying phase (0:00–4:30)
Keep P: 90
At ~3:00 → F: 1–2

Target:
Yellow at ~4:30–5:00

Maillard phase (4:30–7:30)
4:30 → P: 80 / F: 2
6:00 → P: 70 / F: 3

👉 Keep momentum—don’t let it drag

First crack (~7:30–8:30)
Before FC:
P: 65 / F: 3–4
At FC:
P: 60 / F: 4–5
Development (key difference)
Longer: 90–120 sec
Slightly higher end temp (~210–215°C equivalent)

Drop:

~9:30–10:30
Medium to medium-dark

⚠️ Watch for:
Too light → rubbery / harsh
Too much early heat → tipping/scorching

⚖️ Key Differences on Hottop
| Variable     | Gesha          | Robusta               |
| ------------ | -------------- | --------------------- |
| Charge heat  | Higher         | Slightly lower        |
| Early power  | Max (100)      | Slightly reduced (90) |
| Roast length | Longer         | Shorter               |
| Development  | Short          | Longer                |
| Fan usage    | Later, careful | Earlier, more freedom |

📊 Target RoR Landmarks
| Time | Stage         | Target RoR (°C/min) | What you're doing            |
| ---- | ------------- | ------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| 1:20 | Turning point | 18–20               | Moderate शुरुआत              |
| 3:00 | Early drying  | 16–18               | Stable ऊर्जा                 |
| 5:00 | Yellow        | 13–15               | Controlled गति               |
| 6:30 | Mid-Maillard  | 11–13               | Maintain momentum            |
| 8:00 | First crack   | 8–10                | Slightly stronger than Gesha |
| Drop | ~10:00        | 5–7                 | More developed finish        |

🎮 Control translation
Start slightly gentler (P90 vs P100)
→ Avoid harshness
Keep RoR from dropping too fast mid-roast
→ Robusta hates “stalling”
Post first crack:
→ Hold a bit more energy than Gesha
→ Longer development = smoother cup





















📈 What makes this curve “Robusta-specific”
🔶 RoR (key difference)
Starts lower (~24 vs ~28)
Declines more gently
Stays slightly higher at first crack

👉 This reflects:

Less aggressive early heat
More sustained energy through the middle
Stronger finish for development


Wednesday, 9 July 2025

Verbos 254v (buchla format)

 This is essentially two Buchla 257 modules in one.....
 with an additional CV in. 


Great for smaller systems where in one panel space 
it can do most of the scaling , 
adding and modifying of voltages you would ever need. 


Each section has 4 inputs.

Input 1/2:  Inverts/attenuates and scales voltages 
                 from the input .... allows for -12 to zero 
                 to +12V control of whatever is plugged 
                 into the jack

Input 3/4 : The voltages can be crossfaded with 
                  the knob or a CV at the banana input 
                  between.

 V(Offset):  Adds a DC offset to the final output.
                   The offset knob's range of output is
                   -12 to +12V
                   (12'oclock is 0V if nothing is plugged 
                    into any inputs)
                   

Comparison NST vs EVN

 We’ll compare:

Northern Star Resources (NST)
Evolution Mining (EVN)

…and focus specifically on the balance sheet (financial strength)

Assets = Liabilities + Equity

📊 Side-by-side (simplified balance sheet view)

MetricNST (approx)EVN (FY2025 actual)
Total Assets~$20.4B~$9.6B
Total Liabilities~$5.5B~$4.7B
Equity~$14.9B~$5.0B
Current Ratio~1.8x~1.5–1.6x
Debt (relative)LowModerate
ScaleVery largeMid-large


-------------------

🔍 1. Who is financially “safer”?

👉 NST wins here

  • Lower leverage (debt vs earnings ~0.2–0.4x)
  • EVN higher (~0.6–0.9x)

🧠 Translation:

  • NST has more buffer if things go wrong
  • EVN uses more debt to grow

👉 Think:

  • NST = conservative
  • EVN = slightly more aggressive 

--------------------------

🔍 2. Liquidity (short-term survival)

Both are solid:

  • NST: ~1.8x
  • EVN: ~1.5x+

✅ Both can comfortably pay short-term bills

👉 No red flags for either


-------------------------------

🔍 3. Balance sheet size (this matters more than you think)

  • NST assets: ~$20B
  • EVN assets: ~$9.6B

👉 NST is more than 2x bigger

🧠 Why this matters:

  • More mines → more diversification
  • Less risk if one operation fails

👉 NST is structurally more resilient

-----------------------

🔍 4. Quality of balance sheet (this is subtle but important)

Here’s where it gets interesting:

🟢 NST

  • Huge asset base (Super Pit etc.)
  • Strong equity buffer
  • Lower debt

👉 Feels like a “fortress balance sheet”


🟡 EVN

  • Smaller but still strong
  • Uses more debt strategically
  • Very strong cash generation recently

👉 Feels like:

“Efficient operator using capital more aggressively”

-----------------

🔍 5. The BIG philosophical difference

This is the key insight most beginners miss:

🟢 NST strategy

  • Scale
  • Lower risk
  • Strong balance sheet
  • Massive production base

👉 “Big, stable, dominant”


🟡 EVN strategy

  • Higher margins (often better profitability)
  • More disciplined capital allocation
  • Slightly more leverage

👉 “Smaller, sharper, more efficient”

---------------

⚖️ Core equation (applies to both)

Assets=Liabilities+EquityAssets = Liabilities + Equity

But what differs is how they structure the right-hand side:

  • NST → more equity, less debt
  • EVN → relatively more debt, higher returns focus
----------

🏆 So… which balance sheet is better?

🥇 For safety → NST

  • Lower debt
  • Bigger asset base
  • More resilient

👉 If gold price drops or operations fail → NST safer


🥇 For efficiency/returns → EVN

  • Better margins historically
  • Strong capital discipline
  • Uses debt to boost returns

👉 If things go well → EVN can outperform

--------------

💡 The simple takeaway (this is the gold nugget)

When you compare them on CommSec:

👉 NST = stronger balance sheet
👉 EVN = potentially higher-return operator


🧭 How YOU should think about it

When you open these on CommSec, ask:

  • Do I want:
    • 🛡️ Safety & scale? → lean NST
    • Efficiency & upside? → lean EVN
-----------